{"id":1028,"date":"2026-10-18T02:34:56","date_gmt":"2026-10-18T02:34:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/barbierilawfirm.com\/guides\/guides-aggravated-sexual-assault-charges-texas-accused-professionals\/what-is-the-best-defense-against-sexual-assault-charges\/"},"modified":"2026-10-20T16:27:00","modified_gmt":"2026-10-20T16:27:00","slug":"what-is-the-best-defense-against-sexual-assault-charges","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/barbierilawfirm.com\/guides\/guides-aggravated-sexual-assault-charges-texas-accused-professionals\/what-is-the-best-defense-against-sexual-assault-charges\/","title":{"rendered":"Defenses to Sexual Assault Charges in Texas | Barbieri"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/span>\"Interior
\n

Sex Crimes Defense | Collin County & Dallas-Fort Worth<\/p>

Facing a Sexual Assault Charge in Texas? Understand Your Defense Options<\/h1>

Every case turns on its facts. Heather Barbieri reviews the evidence, explains the charge and lays out the options available to you. Your free, confidential initial consultation comes with no obligation to continue.<\/p>

Schedule a Free Consultation<\/a><\/div>
Schedule a Free Consultation<\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

By Heather Barbieri \u00b7 Published October 17, 2026<\/p>\n\n

\n\n

Defenses to Sexual Assault Charges in Texas: How the Facts Shape Your Options<\/h2>\n\n
\n

If someone you love has just been accused of sexual assault, you don't have to work out the next steps alone. Call our office or send us your case details to talk it through. Talk it through with our team — the first consultation is free, confidential, and carries no obligation.<\/p>

Get a free consultation<\/a><\/div>
Get a free consultation<\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
\"A<\/figure>\n

Why No Single Defense Fits Every Sexual Assault Charge<\/h2>\n

No single defense works in every sexual assault case. The right approach depends on the exact charge, the conduct alleged, the timeline, and the proof the State has. A defense is built by reviewing the full record, not by picking one theory from a list.<\/p>\n

Sexual assault is defined in Texas Penal Code \u00a7 22.011<\/a>. Aggravated sexual assault is defined in \u00a7 22.021<\/a>. These two sections are the starting point. Each element in them is a question a defense lawyer can test against the evidence.<\/p>\n

The two charges carry very different stakes. Aggravated sexual assault is a first-degree felony. Under \u00a7 22.021(f), a sentence of at least 25 years applies when the victim is younger than 6, or when the victim is younger than 14 and certain listed aggravating circumstances are present. A defense plan has to match the charge on paper and the facts in the file.<\/p>\n

So the first step is always the same. Read the charging language, then the police report, then every statement and record. Only then can anyone say which defenses deserve a closer look.<\/p>\n

Consent and the Texas Definition of Sexual Assault<\/h2>\n

Consent is often the central question in a Texas sexual assault case. The statute makes lack of consent part of the offense. That means consent shapes almost every part of the review.<\/p>\n

Under Penal Code \u00a7 1.07<\/a>, consent means assent in fact, whether express or apparent. The words “in fact” matter. A defense looks at what each person said and did, not only at what one person later reported.<\/p>\n

Section 22.011(b) lists when conduct is without consent. Those circumstances include force, violence, or coercion. They also include threats the other person believes can be carried out. A person who is unconscious, physically unable to resist, or unaware the act is happening also falls within the list. So does an act in which the actor intentionally impairs the other person’s power to appraise or control his or her conduct by administering any substance without that person’s knowledge. Each one is a fact to check against the record.<\/p>\n

A defense typically asks several questions. What was said before, during, and after? What was the relationship between the two people? Was there earlier contact, and how did each person act afterward? These answers are tested against text messages, witness accounts, and timelines.<\/p>\n

Aggravated sexual assault works the same way on consent. Under \u00a7 22.021<\/a>, the conduct is without consent when it occurs under the same circumstances listed in \u00a7 22.011(b). The aggravating factors in \u00a7 22.021(a)(2) raise the stakes. The consent questions still apply.<\/p>\n

Identity and Alibi: When Who Is at Issue, Not What Happened<\/h2>\n

An identity defense argues the accused is not the person involved. It does not ask whether consent existed. It asks who was there.<\/p>\n

Alibi evidence shows where the accused was at the time in question. The defense checks that account against the alleged timeline. Useful records can include location data, phone records, transportation records, and receipts. Witnesses who saw the accused at a specific time and place can also matter.<\/p>\n

These records only help if they still exist. Some records are kept for a limited time, so early requests matter. Waiting can mean losing the proof that would answer the timeline.<\/p>\n

Identity problems can also appear in arrest records. Under Code of Criminal Procedure art. 55A.006<\/a>, a person may seek expunction of identifying information from an arrest record. That applies when the arrest happened solely because of inaccurate identifying information caused by a clerical error. It can also apply when another arrested person falsely gave the first person’s identifying information without consent.<\/p>\n

Key Evidence: Testing What the State Says It Has<\/h2>\n

The defense tests how the State’s evidence was gathered, handled, and recorded. Evidence in these cases often includes DNA and forensic results, medical examination records, video, text and social media messages, and a timeline of events.<\/p>\n

Testing evidence means asking how each item was collected and documented. Chain of custody is the record showing who held an item and when. A gap in that record can weaken what the item is said to prove. The defense also reviews the procedures investigators followed.<\/p>\n

Statements deserve the same scrutiny.<\/p>\n

Each statement is compared against the recording, the timing, and the other evidence. The defense asks whether the pieces fit together, or whether the State’s account rests on one item alone.<\/p>\n

“He Said, She Said” Cases and Claims of a False Report<\/h2>\n

In a he-said, she-said case, the dispute is often about credibility, not physical proof. The defense weighs each person’s account against the record. The result depends on the facts of each case.<\/p>\n

Consistency over time matters. The defense compares the first report with later accounts, including police interviews. Messages sent before and after the event can show how the relationship looked at the time. That may differ from later descriptions.<\/p>\n

Prior relationship and motive also matter. The defense looks at whether the report came after a dispute, a breakup, or another event that may bear on the account. Motive questions are factual. They are answered from the record, not assumed.<\/p>\n

A claim of a false report is handled the same way. The defense asks what records and witnesses show about the event, and whether the account changed over time. No lawyer can predict how a credibility contest will end.<\/p>\n\n

\n

Not sure what your next step is?<\/h3>

Talk it through with our team — the first consultation is free, confidential, and carries no obligation.<\/p>

Get a free consultation<\/a><\/div>
Get a free consultation<\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

What to Avoid in the First Days After an Accusation<\/h2>\n

Avoid contacting the accuser, deleting records, or giving a statement before speaking with a criminal defense lawyer. Early choices often decide what evidence survives.<\/p>\n